Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

Date: February 26, 2020 | Category: Winner Casino Online

Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

These Milford, Massachusetts anti-Foxwoods Casino protesters carried the day if the project was defeated by voters recently (Image source: AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Sorry, Foxwoods: it seems you’re not desired in Massachusetts, either. The Connecticut gambling giant had been soundly defeated at the polls this week, as voters in the town of Milford, Massachusetts decided they don’t want a casino resort in their backyards.

Three Down for the (Voter) Count

This is becoming a story that is routine Massachusetts, where voters rejected proposals in East Boston and Palmer earlier this month. In this instance, Foxwoods had been looking to create a $1 billion complex in the town that is boston-area compete for that region’s sole casino license.

When the first returns began coming in, it was clear that the casino vote wasn’t going to go Foxwoods’ way. CEO Scott Butera quickly conceded defeat once the polls closed, telling casino supporters that the vote meant that plans for the casino would absolutely not be in the years ahead. Once all the votes were in, the margin ended up being enormous: 6,361 contrary to the plan, and 3,480 because of it, or around a 65%-35% split.

Foxwoods spent a large sum of money marketing the casino, nonetheless it ended up beingn’t enough to convince locals that it was a deal that is good the local economy, apparently. The opposition carried the day while they promoted the fact that there would be many new jobs created and more than $30 million in new revenue for the town.

‘Our city wasn’t for sale,’ stated John Seaver of the group that is anti-casino Milford. ‘They wanted to come in and call the shots, and they almost did. Nevertheless the people rose up, pushed straight back and overwhelmingly stated ‘this town is not for purchase.”

Opponents warned that adding a casino resort could increase criminal activity into the city, as well as depress property values. That, along side warnings of massive traffic jams, was seemingly enough to convince most residents that are milford vote ‘no’.

According to Butera, though, the real problem is that myths about casino gambling are influencing voters, a lot more than arguments in favor to build the resorts.

‘we think people are afraid associated with the unknown,’ Butera stated. ‘There’s lots of myths in what casinos are…they are not these crazy places that are hedonistic. They are actually very nice resorts that have actually much more to do [than] simply games.’

The Milford vote was the past one scheduled at the least for the right moment among a series of binding referendums held by towns over whether they would approve casinos built in their towns. Applications can still come set for the three casino licenses and the one slot parlor permit in the state until the end of the however year.

Even though the results that are recent casino businesses have actually been poor in these votes, other companies experienced more success. Both Wynn Resorts and MGM have successfully had projects approved by their local communities, allowing them to compete for licenses within the Greater Boston Area and Western Massachusetts, respectively. Three towns have already supported plans to build smaller slots parlors in their communities, though only one will ultimately get a license from the state.

Other jobs nevertheless hang in the balance. Mohegan Sun narrowly lost a vote to accept a casino in Palmer so narrowly, in fact, that they’re getting a recount that is official of results later on this month. Meanwhile, Suffolk Downs in East Boston is considering the possibility for changing their plan and placing the entirety of the casino resort in neighboring Revere, which voted in favor of allowing them to build there.

New Jersey Online Gambling Soft Release Is Not Without Glitches

The brand new Jersey online casino soft launch has not been without some snafus. Which will be why, ahem, you do soft launches.

New Jersey’s soft launch of these online gambling platform was, for the part that is most, a success. The games work, the sites are up and running, plus the verification systems are doing their job. In fact, the only real issue is that those systems were working a little too hard, as quite a couple of residents had difficulty proving these were really in New Jersey.

We Have Launch…Sort Of

On Nov. 21, the launch that is soft of first round of web gambling internet sites went real time for players located in New Jersey. During the soft launch which is designed to weed out any bugs and ensure things were working as planned only about 500 players were allowed on each site. Still, real money play was available, making this the very first time state-regulated on the web gambling had taken place in New Jersey.

Seven casinos were approved to run websites at the right period of the launch. The Borgata was included by them, Trump Plaza, the Taj Mahal, the Golden Nugget, Tropicana, Bally’s, and Caesars Atlantic City. Combined, those sites were able to run 14 gambling internet sites, including a mix of both casino and online poker sites.

Assuming all goes well in this soft launch period which extends to the ‘real’ launch date of Nov. 26 online gambling will be available to all or any residents in nj-new jersey avove the age of 21 starting early week that is next. But according to some customers, there are positively kinks in the system that still need to be ironed out.

As we reported earlier, probably the most predominant problem therefore far ended up being also the one that was the most predictable. Numerous people had trouble logging into the sites as a result of the fact that either the geolocation pc software getting used couldn’t be sure they had been in New Jersey, or these people weren’t immediately able to meet other verification standards so that you can prove their residency.


For instance, some players tried logging in from various locations and nevertheless couldn’t find a method to access any of the sites. New Jersey resident Joseph Brennen reportedly attempted to log in from the McDonald’s in Atlantic City, but was told by various web sites that they couldn’t tell where he was located, or that they didn’t think he was in New Jersey. Then tried driving inland and north about five miles, but nevertheless could not get the sites to recognize he was at the state.

Driving another ten miles inland and attempting to connect from a restaurant also didn’t create any results. Though some associated with sites now permitted him to register accounts, they still desired some proof of residency such as a utility bill which he couldn’t instantly provide.

And Brennen had beenn’t the one that is only went into such problems.

‘I made a small deposit, but when we attempted to play they said I wasn’t in nj,’ said Tina Gonzalez, who had a long call with customer care and saw her computer crash while trying setting up a free account on Caesars’ website. ‘I’m afraid that whenever they you will need to do this statewide regarding the 26th, it’s going to be mayhem.’

The inability to prove one’s location seemed to be more widespread while few people reported those kinds of technical problems. Even though many industry professionals predicted some people would get locked from the sites due to being very close to the New Jersey edge, it is unclear why this was occurring just as much as 10 to 15 miles far from the state’s borders as well.

Hopefully, these issues will be circumvented by the launch that is hard to come.

‘ The opening that is soft be used to show the division that most systems perform as required under the stress of real time gaming and that operational and revenue reporting controls are effective. Staff will continually gauge the progress of every platform provider before enabling them to open gaming to the general public on November 26,’ stated DGE Director David Rebuck in a statement.

London’s Hippodrome Brings in Door Dwarves Amidst Debate

Well-known person that is little star Peter Dinklage is not likely to be applying at the Hippodrome (Image source: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

In a controversial move that could possibly be viewed as exploitative or helpful depending on your viewpoint who owns the Hippodrome, the casino that is largest in great britain , has put out an ad to let the world know he is looking to hire little people as ‘door dwarves’ at the venue for the vacations.

Risking being called a circus carney, the master marketed for the positions in the widely read Metro newspaper, stating that the casino is looking to ‘create a group of Britain’s tiniest bouncers Door Dwarves for the entrance that is new in Street.’

Owner Claims Success

Based on reports, trials of the initiative, which would introduce a force of individuals 4 foot 10 inches or smaller to man the entry to the casino, were said to have gone ‘fantastically’ well, so when a result, the management at the place has been convinced to introduce the system on a basis that is full-time.

CEO and chairman of the casino Simon Thomas, trying to justify the scheme, explained to the media that the device was just the latest in a long type of dwarf employment opportunities at the Leicester Square casino.

‘The Hippodrome is A london that is phenomenal organization. It opened in 1900 as a circus that is indoor people like Little Titch regarding the cast,’ explained Thomas, incorporating that legendary P.T. Barnum had circus performer and little person Tom Thumb perform at the venue back the time.

‘We had high-diving dwarves whom dived from the mistrals’ gallery 60-feet up into a water tank,’ he added. ‘So they’ve been very much part of the history of this place.’

How charming can you get. It’s like Cirque du Soleil, however the shortstuff version.

Interesting Logic

Since bouncers are typically very large, wide and menacing-looking characters, who the common Joe would prefer not to cross, hiring a team of smaller workers does seem such as a move that is strange the casino if they are trying to deter the riff-raff from causing trouble during the site.

‘Nobody messes by having a dwarf, so in a way, these are typically very good doorman,’ argued Thomas. ‘They can manage people much better than having a human eclipse on the door as a number of the clubs do in London. No one will probably choose on someone who is below-average height. It’s not quite a thing that is macho do, so it is an excellent way of managing the entranceway.

‘ There is no discrimination at all,’ claimed Thomas, building up to borrow possibly the many over-used phrase of the century that is 21st dispute complaints that the location could be poking fun at little people. ‘i find we live in a global world of political correctness gone angry.’

But that it is, at the very least, exploiting them if we are to take the opinion that the job role is not poking fun at little people, should we perhaps take the opinion? Thomas himself stated that the initiative is ‘building on the rich heritage of innovative activity’ so clearly it’s not just their unintimidating stature which he wishes to utilize.

‘I am trying to run a very entertaining that is large and I have a lot of different people who have lots of different skills,’ explained the Hippodrome president. ‘we have actually chosen those skills and physical attributes that are appropriate to that task. They’re very expert and have to get on with it.’